- AutorIn
- Ph.D. Warsha Barde Deutschen Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE)
- Titel
- Emergence of Individuality Beyond Nature and Nurture
- Untertitel
- The Role of Learning, Experience, and Agency
- Zitierfähige Url:
- https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa2-1018967
- Erstveröffentlichung
- 2025
- Datum der Einreichung
- 03.07.2025
- Datum der Verteidigung
- 24.10.2025
- Abstract (DE)
- Individualität – also charakteristische Muster im Verhalten, Denken und Fühlen – entsteht durch das Zusammenspiel von Genetik, Entwicklung und Umwelt. Selbst bei kontrollierter Genetik und geteilter Umgebung zeigen sich stabile Verhaltensunterschiede. Dies wird nicht nur in Zwillingsstudien deutlich, sondern auch bei genetisch identischen Mäusen, bei denen nicht-geteilte Umweltfaktoren wie körperliche Aktivität, soziale Interaktionen und individuelle Erfahrungen zu Verhaltensdivergenz führen. Um diese Faktoren näher zu untersuchen, nutzte ich das automatisierte IntelliCage-System (IC), in dem isogene weibliche Mäuse in Gruppen gehalten werden und eine Reihe von Lernaufgaben durchlaufen. Sie konnten sich frei bewegen, interagieren und Aufgaben bearbeiten, während ihr Verhalten über Monate hinweg aufgezeichnet wurde. Es zeigten sich stabile individuelle Unterschiede in Explorationsstil, Lernengagement und Leistung, die mit neuroplastischen Markern wie hippocampaler Neurogenese und funktionaler Konnektivität korrelierten. In einer Folgestudie setzte ich eine 'computer-spielerische' Version des IC ein, in der die Mäuse Lernaufgaben selbstbestimmt und leistungsgesteuert durchlaufen konnten. Manche Tiere machten schneller Fortschritte, angetrieben durch häufigeres Aufsuchen von Belohnungen. Diese autonomen Lernprofile gingen mit erhöhter Neurogenese einher – ein Hinweis darauf, dass individuelle Entscheidung zur Teilnahme am Lernen neuronale Plastizität fördert, unabhängig von Genetik oder geteilter Umwelt. Um die Rolle von Lernen und sozialer Anreicherung weiter zu differenzieren, programmierte ich IC so, dass einige Mäuse keinen Aufgaben-Zugang hatten. Lernfähige Tiere entwickelten unterschiedlichere Lernverläufe und höhere Neurogenese, während lernentzogene Tiere homogener blieben. Auch das Sozialverhalten veränderte sich: lernende Mäuse wurden in Konkurrenzsituationen dominanter. Soziale Netzwerk-Analysen zeigten stabile soziale Rollen und eine Wechselwirkung zwischen kognitivem Engagement, sozialer Einbindung und neuronaler Plastizität. Computermodelle bestätigten, dass Verstärkungsmechanismen – nicht Zufall – diese Unterschiede verstärkten. Diese Arbeit liefert ein mechanistisches Verständnis dafür, wie individuelle Erfahrungen zu Verhaltens- und Hirndivergenz führen. Sie zeigt, dass Individualität auch bei gleichem genetischen Ausgang durch subtile Unterschiede in Erfahrung und Entscheidung entstehen kann – mit Lernen als zentralem Modulator dieses Prozesses.
- Abstract (EN)
- Individuality, the distinct patterns of behavior, cognition, and emotion, arises from the dynamic interplay of genetics, development, and environment. Even when genetics and shared environments are controlled for, substantial behavioral variation still emerges. This is observed not only in twin studies but also in genetically identical mice, where non-shared environmental factors like physical activity, social interaction, and unique experiences drive divergence. To dissect the role and relative contribution of these non-shared factors, I used the IntelliCage (IC), an automated home-cage system in which isogenic female mice are group-housed and undergo a series of place-learning tasks. Mice could freely explore, interact, and engage in tasks, allowing long-term tracking of spontaneous behavior. Stable individual differences emerged in exploration style, learning engagement, and performance. These differences positively correlated with markers of neural plasticity - hippocampal neurogenesis and functional connectivity. In a follow-up experiment, I used a gamified version of the IC framework that allowed mice to self-pace through learning tasks based on their performance. Some mice advanced faster and further, driven by more frequent reward-seeking and task engagement revealing unique, autonomous learning profiles that also correlated with differences in hippocampal neurogenesis, showing that individual agency in engaging with the learning offer drives plasticity beyond genetic or shared environmental factors. To parse the roles of learning and social enrichment, I programmed IC to restrict task access for some mice. Learning-enabled mice developed more divergent learning paths and higher neurogenesis, while learning-deprived mice remained more behaviorally uniform. Social dynamics were also affected: learning mice became dominant in competitive settings. Furthermore, social network analysis revealed stable social roles and a reciprocal relationship between cognitive engagement, social connectivity, and neural plasticity. Computational modeling confirmed that reinforcement, rather than stochasticity and random variation, amplified these emerging differences. Overall, this thesis offers a mechanistic dissection of how individualized experiences drive behavioral and neural divergence, providing a framework to understand the emergence of individuality from shared starting points. Together, these findings demonstrate that individuality can emerge from subtle differences in experience and choice, and that learning acts as a powerful modulator of both behavioral and neural individuality, even in the absence of genetic variation.
- Freie Schlagwörter (DE)
- Individualität, Lernen und Gedächtnis, Neurogenese im Hippocampus von Erwachsenen, Umweltanreicherung, Nicht geteilte Umgebung
- Freie Schlagwörter (EN)
- Individuality, Learning and memory, Adult hippocampal neurogenesis, Environmental enrichment, Non-shared environment
- Klassifikation (DDC)
- 610
- Klassifikation (RVK)
- WW 4226
- GutachterIn
- Prof. Dr. Gerd Kempermann
- Prof. Dr. Ulman Lindenberger
- Den akademischen Grad verleihende / prüfende Institution
- Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden
- Version / Begutachtungsstatus
- publizierte Version / Verlagsversion
- URN Qucosa
- urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa2-1018967
- Veröffentlichungsdatum Qucosa
- 05.03.2026
- Dokumenttyp
- Dissertation
- Sprache des Dokumentes
- Englisch
- Lizenz / Rechtehinweis
CC BY 4.0- Inhaltsverzeichnis
Zusammenfassung Summary Acknowledgements Content List of figures List of tables List of equations List of abbreviations Publications 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Nature and nurture: genetic and environmental influences on behavior 1.1.1 Early scientific views: Nature vs. Nurture 1.1.2 Introduction of the gene + environment (G+E) model 1.1.3 Gene-Environment interactions (GxE) 1.1.4 Gene-Environment correlations (rGE) 1.1.5 Toward a dynamic understanding of behavior 1.2 Individual differences persist even when genotype and environment are held constant 1.2.1 The concept of shared and non-shared environments 1.2.2 Non-shared environment – differential experience – a gloomy prospect 1.2.3 Stochasticity and noisy developmental processes 1.2.4 Epigenetic variation 1.3 Environmental enrichment as a key paradigm for unraveling gene × environment interactions 1.3.1 Using ENR to look into the non-shared component – a solution to the gloomy prospect 1.4 Adult hippocampal neurogenesis: A phenotype of brain plasticity that is sensitive to experiences 1.5 Gap in understanding underlying mechanisms of enrichment and individuality 1.5.1 The role of non-shared environmental factors 1.5.2 Early theories: Handling, speedy maturation, stress and hormonal modulation 1.5.3 Social interaction and the role of ‘play’ 1.5.4 The learning-memory hypothesis 1.5.5 Active interaction over passive exposure 1.5.6 Learning as the central mechanism 1.6 Aim and scope of thesis 1.6.1 Specific question 1 1.6.2 Specific question 2 1.6.3 Specific question 3 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1 Animal husbandry 2.2 IntelliCage (IC) 2.3 Large-scale CMOS-based biosensor and recording acquisition setup 2.3.1 Acute brain slice preparation and recovery 2.3.2 Electrical stimulation-evoked response recordings 2.3.3 Pharmacologically-induced response recordings 2.4 Tissue preparation and immunohistochemistry 2.5 Electrophysiology data analysis 2.5.1 Hippocampal-cortical structural clusters 2.5.2 Mean activity 2.5.3 Functional connectivity and causality 2.5.4 Network connectivity metrics 2.5.5 Graph map visualization 2.6 IC behavioral analysis 2.6.1 Roaming entropy (RE) 2.6.2 Learning and flexibility 2.6.3 Social interactions 2.6.4 Linear mixed effect models 2.6.5 Consistency and repeatability 2.7 Simulation and comparison of Reinforcement and Null Models 2.8 Morris water maze (MWM) 2.9 Statistical analysis 3 RESULTS 3.1 Learning as a catalyst for individuality: differential experiences shape brain connectomics and behavioral divergence in isogenic mice 3.1.1 IntelliCage acts as an enriched environment 3.1.2 Emergence of individuality in behavior 3.1.3 Stability in the face of change 3.1.4 Individuality in behavior correlates with individuality in brain plasticity 3.1.5 Conclusion 3.2 Beyond nature, nurture, and chance: Individual choices shape divergent learning biographies and brain plasticity 3.2.1 A video game-inspired self-paced learning framework in the IC 3.2.2 Mice develop divergent exploratory patterns in the adaptation phase prior to self-paced learning phase 3.2.3 Mice independently unlock successive task levels demonstrating variability in their learning speed and task progression 3.2.4 Task engagement correlates positively with task progression and learning rank 3.2.5 IC mice show stable inter-individual differences in adult hippocampal neurogenesis 3.2.6 IC mice show enhanced spatial learning and strategy use in the MWM task 3.2.7 Top-ranking IC mice perform better than the rest in MWM task 3.2.8 Conclusion 3.3 Social inequality in learning opportunities constrains behavioral diversity, impairs neurogenesis and shapes social hierarchies 3.3.1 Manipulation of Learning Opportunities and Social Experiences 3.3.2 Comparable patterns of exploratory individuality in learning and deprived groups during adaptation 3.3.3 Emergence of individuality is fortified by access to learning and stunted by deprivation 3.3.4 Inter-individual differences in adult hippocampal neurogenesis 3.3.5 IC mice show enhanced spatial learning and cognitive flexibility in the MWM task 3.3.6 Learning group showed slightly better performance in MWM task 3.3.7 Learning-deprived mice exhibit a competitively subordinate phenotype during the social dominance task 3.3.8 Conclusion 3.4 Impact of social interactions on learning and neurogenesis 3.4.1 Following events occur more often than by chance and reflect viable social behavior 3.4.2 Individuality in social behavior 3.4.3 A graph theory-based approach to represent social relationships 3.4.4 Conclusions 3.5 Beyond stochasticity: Reinforcement shapes behavioral divergence 3.5.1 Reinforcement model shows increase in mean performance and variance in the learning phase 3.5.2 Reinforcement model shows reduction in mean RE and increased variance in the exploratory phase 3.5.3 Conclusion 4 DISCUSSION 4.1 Mechanistic question – how do inter-individual differences emerge? 4.1.1 Non-shared environment – Dissection through IC no longer a gloomy prospect 4.1.2 Evidence for the ‘learning-memory’ hypothesis 4.1.3 Feedback loop between brain and behavior 4.2 Evolutionary question – why do inter-individual differences exist? 4.2.1 Consistent personality traits: Costs to flexibility 4.2.2 State–behavior feedbacks 4.2.3 Frequency-dependent selection 4.2.4 Brain and behavioral plasticity 4.3 Individuality 5 APPENDIX 5.1 Statistical estimates from experiment 1 5.2 Statistical estimates from experiment 2 5.3 Statistical estimates from experiment 3 5.4 Body weight 5.5 Correlation between exploration in adaptation phase and learning success in learning phase 5.6 Additional water maze parameters from experiment 2 5.7 Additional water maze parameters from experiment 3 5.8 Comparison of null and reinforcement models 5.9 Statistical equation modelling (SEM) 6 BIBLIOGRAPHY 7 DECLARATIONS