- authors00000
- Rebekka Schwesig Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Julia VeltenMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
- Jürgen HoyerTechnische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- title
- The Diagnostic Interview for Sexual Dysfunctions in Women for DSM-5 and ICD-11
- subtitle
- Development and initial validation using a vignette-based approach
- Please use the following URL when quoting:
- https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa2-960932
- Source
- International journal of methods in psychiatric research
Erscheinungsjahr: 2024
Jahrgang: 33
Heft: 1
E-ISSN: 1557-0657
Artikelnummer: e2004 - publication_date
- 2023
- Abstract (EN)
- Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly developed Diagnostic Interview for Sexual Dysfunctions in Women (DISEX-F), which covers diagnostic criteria of DSM-5 and ICD-11. Methods Thirty-two actresses portrayed 32 cases of female sexual dysfunctions (= standardized patients). To calculate inter-rater reliability, each standardized patient was interviewed independently by two trained diagnosticians using the DISEX-F. Interviews were videotaped, and each videotape was evaluated by two other independent diagnosticians. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by comparing the assigned diagnoses to the target diagnoses pre-determined in the case vignettes. As a side criterion, the acceptance of the DISEX-F among diagnosticians was assessed. Results Specificity was found to be generally clinically satisfying (DSM-5: 0.90–0.99; ICD-11: 0.95–0.99), while sensitivity (DSM-5: 0.40–0.92; ICD-11: 0.71–0.96) and inter-rater reliability (DSM-5: Cohen's kappa = 0.44–1; ICD-11: Cohen's kappa = 0.75–0.94) greatly varied between classification systems and disorders. Imprecise acting and false differential diagnostic decisions were identified as major sources of mismatch. The acceptance of the DISEX-F was high. Conclusion Results encourage usage of the DISEX-F for ICD-11 diagnoses. Mixed results were found for DSM-5 diagnoses, which can partly be explained by shortcomings in DSM-5 criteria.
- otherVersion0
- Link zum Artikel, der zuerst in der Zeitschrift „International journal of methods in psychiatric research” im Verlag Wiley erschienen ist.
DOI: 10.1002/mpr.2004 - Keywords (EN)
- DSM‐5, ICD‐11, psychometric properties, sexual dysfunctions, structured interview
- Classification (DDC)
- 610
- Publishing house
- Wiley, Chichester
- version
- publizierte Version / Verlagsversion
- URN Qucosa
- urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa2-960932
- Qucosa date of publication
- 06.11.2025
- Document type
- article
- Document language
- English
- licence
CC BY 4.0