- title
- The Securitization of Global Environmental Policy
- subtitle
- An Argument Against
- Please use the following URL when quoting:
- https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa2-900002
- Source
- European journal for security research
Erscheinungsjahr: 2022
Jahrgang: 7
Seiten: 5-20
E-ISSN: 2365-1695 - publication_date
- 2022
- Abstract (EN)
- Arguing from the traditional point of view with regard to the concept of securitization, this work analyses the effects securitization has on international environmental policy on the example of four case studies—the Rio Conference, the climate change regime, the ozone depletion regime as well as the fragmented forest regime. Contrasting securitization to the variables of regime complexity and the national interest, its twofold effects become evident. While succeeding in “raising the stakes” of an issue, securitization at the same time provokes conflicts between either the actors involved (e.g., forest convention negotiations) or the actors and the regime itself (e.g., climate change regime).
- otherVersion0
- Link zum Artikel der zuerst in der Zeitschrift „European Journal for Security Research” bei Springer Link erschienen ist.
DOI: 10.1007/s41125-022-00083-x - Keywords (DE)
- Versicherheitlichung, Globale Umweltregime, Nationales Interesse, Souveränität, Zusammenarbeit
- Keywords (EN)
- Securitization, Global environmental regimes, National interest, Sovereignty, Cooperation
- Classification (DDC)
- 320
- 620
- Publishing house
- Springer International Publishing, [Cham]
- version
- publizierte Version / Verlagsversion
- URN Qucosa
- urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa2-900002
- Qucosa date of publication
- 26.02.2024
- Document type
- article
- Document language
- English
- licence
CC BY 4.0